Responses to Information Requests

​​​​​​​Responses to Information Requests (RIRs) are research reports on country conditions. They are requested by IRB decision-makers.

The database contains a seven-year archive of English and French RIRs. Earlier RIRs may be found on the European Country of Origin Information Network website.

RIR​s published by the IRB on its website may have attachments that are inaccessible due to technical constraints and may include translations of documents originally written in languages other than English or French. To obtain a copy of such attachments and/or translated version of the RIR attachments, please email us.​

Related Links

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Responses to Information Requests (RIRs) cite publicly accessible information available at the time of publication and within time constraints. A list of references and additional sources consulted are included in each RIR. Sources cited are considered the most current information available as of the date of the RIR.            

RIRs are not, and do not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim for refugee protection. Rather, they are intended to support the refugee determination process. More information on the methodology used by the Research Directorate can be found here.          

The assessment and weight to be given to the information in the RIRs are the responsibility of independent IRB members (decision-makers) after considering the evidence and arguments presented by the parties.           

The information presented in RIRs solely reflects the views and perspectives of the sources cited and does not necessarily reflect the position of the IRB or the Government of Canada.          

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or record-keeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

28 January 2004

PER42333.E

Peru: Whether officers of the Anti-terrorism Directorate (Dirección Contra el Terrorismo, DIRCOTE), formerly known as the National Anti-terrorism Directorate (Dirección Nacional Contra el Terrorismo, DINCOTE), rape and torture leftists with impunity; the present situation of DIRCOTE officers
Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa

Although no information on incidents of rape or torture involving officers of the Anti-terrorism Directorate (Dirección Contra el Terrorismo, DIRCOTE), formerly known as the National Anti-terrorism Directorate (Dirección Nacional Contra el Terrorismo, DINCOTE), could be found among the sources consulted by the Research Directorate, both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch claim that torture by state agents remains a problem in Peru (AI 2003; HRW Jan.2004).

Only one incident of alleged wrongdoing by DIRCOTE officers since December 2002 could be found among the sources consulted (Correo 16 Sept. 2003; ibid. 17 Sept. 2003). In September 2003, Minister of Interior Fernando Rospigliosi ordered an investigation of police officers, including an unspecified number of DIRCOTE members, who had allegedly intercepted telephone conversations and engaged in surveillance activities on behalf of the private security firms All Security and Acontrol (ibid. 16 Sept. 2003). The Lima newspaper Correo reported that one of the accused officers, former DIRCOTE member Walter Capa Urbillón, had used equipment donated by the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) to monitor telephone conversations (ibid. 17 Sept. 2003).

A number of articles published in 2003 refer to the situation of the DIRCOTE and its personnel. Examples follow.

In June 2003, the head of the DIRCOTE, General Marco Miyashiro, stated that the Directorate's budget was insufficient to deal with the resurgence of terrorist activities (Correo 26 June 2003). According to Miyashiro, additional funding was needed to reinforce bases in the Ene and Apurímac valleys, as well to hire 25 officers to carry out investigations and gather evidence in connection with the decision to retry individuals convicted of insurgency-related offences by military tribunals (ibid.).

On 18 July 2003, criminals fleeing police in Lima's Surco district stole the pick-up truck of DIRCOTE Major José Ríos Beltrán, forcing him to get out of his vehicle at gunpoint (ibid. 19 July 2003). The truck was later found abandoned (ibid.).

On 3 September 2003, the Lima newspaper El Comercio reported that Antonio Ketín Vidal, former interior minister and head of the DINCOTE, had characterized as totally false (totalmente falso) the finding by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación, CVR) that he had covered up the illegal detention of businessman Samuel Dyer in the Army Intelligence Service (Servicio de Inteligencia del Ejército, SIE) headquarters' basement. He further indicated that SIE officers were responsible for Dyer's detention and that the DINCOTE's role in the operation was purely technical (técnica) (El Comercio 3 Sept. 2003).

In October 2003, the Permanent Congressional Commission (Comisión Permanente del Congreso) endorsed a sub-committee's report calling upon the Office of the Attorney General (Ministerio Público) to investigate former members of the DINCOTE, along with those of other intelligence services, who may have known of the mistreatment of detainees in the SIE headquarters in 1992 (CAJ Oct. 2003). No information on whether the Office of the Attorney General launched such an investigation could be found among the sources consulted by the Research Directorate.

This Response was prepared after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Please find below the list of additional sources consulted in researching this Information Request.

References

Amnesty International (AI). 2003. Amnesty International Report 2003. <http://web.amnesty.org/report2003/Per-summary-eng> [Accessed 8 Jan. 2004]

El Comercio [Lima]. 3 September 2003. "Ketín Vidal niega que haya encubierto secuestro de empresario Dyer." <http://www.elcomercioperu.com.pe/online/html/2003%2D09%2D02/onllima0048066.html> [Accessed 7 Jan. 2004]

Comisión Andina de Juristas (CAJ). October 2003. Cronología Andina. "Perú-Octubre 2003." <http://www.cajpe.org.pe/cronolog/novperu7.htm> [Accessed 7 Jan. 2004]

Correo [Lima]. 17 September 2003. "Policías implicados en supuesta interceptación están en actividad." <http://anteriores.epensa.com.pe/enlinea/ediciones/2003/set/17/ politica/pol03.asp> [Accessed 7 Jan. 2004]

_____. 16 September 2003. "Interior investiga supuesto chuponeo de policías en actividad." <http://anteriores.epensa.com.pe/enlinea/ediciones/2003/set/16/ politica/pol01.asp> [Accessed 7 Jan. 2004]

_____. 19 July 2003. "En persecución hampones roban vehículo de oficial de Dircote." <http://anteriores.epensa.com.pe/enlinea/ediciones/2003/jul/19/ locales/loc04.asp> [Accessed 7 Jan. 2004]

_____. 26 June 2003. "Dircote necesita S/.2 millones para afrontar nuevos juicios a subversivos." <http://anteriores.epensa.com.pe/enlinea/ediciones/2003/jun/26/ politica/pol16.asp> [Accessed 7 Jan. 2004]

Human Rights Watch (HRW). January 2004. Human Rights Watch World Report 2004. <http://hrw.org/english/docs/2004/01/21/peru6988.htm> [Accessed 27 Jan. 2004]

Additional Sources Consulted

IRB databases

Internet sites, including:

24 Horas [Lima]. 2003-2004

Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos (APRODEH)

El Comercio 2003-2004

Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos

Cronología Andina [Lima]. "Perú." Dec. 2002-Nov. 2003

Defensoría del Pueblo

Ministerio del Interior

World News Connection (WNC)

​​
​​

​​​