Responses to Information Requests

​​​​​​​Responses to Information Requests (RIRs) are research reports on country conditions. They are requested by IRB decision-makers.

The database contains a seven-year archive of English and French RIRs. Earlier RIRs may be found on the European Country of Origin Information Network website.

RIR​s published by the IRB on its website may have attachments that are inaccessible due to technical constraints and may include translations of documents originally written in languages other than English or French. To obtain a copy of such attachments and/or translated version of the RIR attachments, please email us.​

Related Links

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Responses to Information Requests (RIRs) cite publicly accessible information available at the time of publication and within time constraints. A list of references and additional sources consulted are included in each RIR. Sources cited are considered the most current information available as of the date of the RIR.            

RIRs are not, and do not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim for refugee protection. Rather, they are intended to support the refugee determination process. More information on the methodology used by the Research Directorate can be found here.          

The assessment and weight to be given to the information in the RIRs are the responsibility of independent IRB members (decision-makers) after considering the evidence and arguments presented by the parties.           

The information presented in RIRs solely reflects the views and perspectives of the sources cited and does not necessarily reflect the position of the IRB or the Government of Canada.          

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or record-keeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available.

22 June 2007

CHN102492.E

China: Reports of raids on Protestant house churches; frequency and location of raids (2005 - 2007)
Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa

Following the introduction of China's Regulations on Religious Affairs in March 2005, there was reportedly a "crackdown" on the activities of house churches in parts of the country (HRW 1 Mar. 2006; CSW 26 Sept. 2005). A 26 September 2005 article by Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW), "a human rights organisation specialising in religious freedom" (ibid. n.d.), indicates that, according to commentators, "the overall repression of the house church is the most intense since 1996" (ibid. 26 Sept. 2005). In 2005, there were reports of house church crackdowns in the provinces of Shanxi, Henan, Hubei, Jiangxi, and Jilin (ibid. Nov. 2005, 1; HRW 1 Mar. 2006). In May 2005, Chinese officials coordinated raids on 100 house churches in Jilin province [northeast China], arresting approximately 600 Christians (ibid.; see also CSW Nov. 2005, 1; ibid. 26 Sept. 2005). During the year, there were also reports of similar incidents in Hebei, Xinjiang, Beijing and Shanghai (CSW Nov. 2005, 1). A 1 March 2006 Human Rights Watch (HRW) report notes that in 2005, mainly large-scale house church meetings were raided.

According to China Aid Association (CAA), a United States (US) based non-governmental organization (NGO) that investigates and advocates religious freedom in China (CAA n.d.), in 2006, there was a decline in the number of house church raids in the country compared with previous years (ibid. Jan. 2007, 2). CAA reports that the greatest "persecution" of house churches in China in 2006 took place in the provinces of Zhejiang and Henan, where the house church movement is said to be "particularly strong" (ibid.; 2, 20). In its Annual Report on Persecution of Chinese House Churches by Province, the CAA indicates that the provinces with the second greatest "persecution" of house churches during the year included Anhui and Xinjiang (ibid.). Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2006 identifies the provinces of Hubei and Yunan as additional locations of house church raids (US 6 Mar. 2007, Sec. 2.c). According to CAA's Annual Report, in 2006, based on the NGO's sources alone, there were more than 650 arrests of house church Christians across 17 of China's 22 provinces (Jan. 2007, 19). Approximately 100 of these Christians were detained for over 10 days, while 18 were sentenced to jail terms exceeding one year (CAA Jan. 2007, 19). Raids on house churches have continued to be reported in 2007, including one in Jiangsu province (ibid. 8 Feb. 2007) and one in Henan province (ibid. 6 Mar. 2007).

According to CAA, while the number of reported raids on house churches in China declined in 2006, there was an increase in the number of house church demolitions and forcible closures compared with the previous year (Jan. 2007, 19). In the province of Zhejiang, three house churches were apparently demolished during the year (ibid.; see also AFP 23 Dec. 2006; ibid. 4 Aug. 2006; The Washington Post 1 Oct. 2006). There were also reports of house churches being destroyed in the provinces of Jilin and Fujian (CAA Jan. 2007, 19). Forcible closures of house churches were reported in Anhui province (ibid.; AsiaNews 12 Dec. 2006), as well as in Guangdong province, Shandong province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Shanghai (CAA Jan. 2007, 19).

The treatment of house churches in China by government officials varies by region (US 15 Sept. 2006; ibid. 6 Mar. 2007, Sec. 2.c; Forum 18 1 Sept. 2005; The Standard 3 Oct. 2006). In some regions of China, house churches with memberships in the hundreds are able to operate openly with the knowledge of the authorities; however, in other areas, small gatherings with a "handful" of members are not allowed (US 6 Mar. 2007, Sec. 2.c; ibid. 15 Sept. 2006). Local officials reportedly have "great discretion" in deciding whether house churches are in violation of religious regulations (ibid.; see also The Standard 3 Oct. 2006). According to a 3 October 2006 article in The Standard, a Hong-Kong-based English language newspaper (The Standard n.d.), "religious freedom seems to vary according to the whims of local authorities and the extent to which unregistered Christians are viewed as potential political threats" (ibid. 3 Oct. 2006).

The International Religious Freedom Report 2006 states that

[h]ouse churches often encounter difficulties when their membership grows, when they arrange for the regular use of facilities for the specific purpose of conducting religious activities, or when they forge links with other unregistered groups or with coreligionists overseas (US 15 Sept. 2006).

The report notes that house church meetings in urban areas are usually small and limited to "a few dozen members or less," while attendance at meetings in small cities and rural areas "may number in the hundreds" (ibid.). However, according to a 27 June 2006 article by the Christian news service Compass Direct (Compass Direct 4 May 2007), Chinese officials in rural areas are "far more likely to attack and raid house church meetings, beating pastors and interrogating church members" (ibid. 27 June 2006).

This Response was prepared after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim for refugee protection. Please find below the list of additional sources consulted in researching this Information Request.

References

Agence France-Presse (AFP). 23 December 2006. "Eight Underground Chinese Christian Leaders Sentenced." (Factiva)

_____. 4 August 2006. "Thousands Fast in China to Protest Arrest of Over 50 Christians." (Factiva)

AsiaNews [Rome]. 12 December 2006. "Christians Tortured in Xinjiang, Anhui Church Forcibly Shut Down." <http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l= en&art=7971&size=A#> [Accessed 3 May 2007]

China Aid Association (CAA). 6 March 2007. "Thirty-Four Chinese House Church Leaders and Three Church Leaders from South Korea Arrested in Henan." <http://www.chinaaid.org/english_site/press_release_detail.php?id=1661> [Accessed 6 Mar. 2007]

_____. 8 February 2007. "House Church Prayer Meeting Raided in Jiangsu Province." <http://www.chinaaid.org/english_site/press_release_detail.php?id=1503> [Accessed 6 Mar. 2007]

_____. January 2007. Annual Report on Persecution of Chinese House Churches by Province: From January 2006 to December 2006. <http://chinaaid.org/pdf/2006_persecution_e.pdf> [Accessed 3 May 2007]

_____. N.d. "China Aid Mission Statement." <http://www.chinaaid.org/english_site/mission.php> [Accessed 3 May 2007]

Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW). November 2005. "China - Current Development and Cases of Concern. Religious Freedom: The Situation of Unregistered Protestant Churches." <http://www.csw.org.uk/Countries/China/Resources/ CSWChinaReportNovember2005.pdf> [Accessed 3 May 2007]

_____. 26 September 2005. "New Government Crackdown on Unregistered Churches." <http://www.csw.org.uk/Resources/Response/article.php?id=61> [Accessed 6 Mar. 2007]

_____. N.d. "Who We Are." <http://www.csw.org.uk/AboutCSW/whoweare.htm> [Accessed 3 May 2007]

Compass Direct [Santa Ana, California]. 4 May 2007. "About Compass Direct." <http://www.compassdirect.org/en/display.php? page=compass&lang=en&length=short&idelement=4508> [Accessed 4 May 2007]

_____. 27 June 2006. "China: Government Claims 'Full and Broad Freedom of Religious Belief'." <http://www.compassdirect.org/en/display.php?page=news&idelement=4422&lang= en&length=short&backpage=archives&critere= &countryname=China&rowcur=0> [Accessed 4 May 2007]

Forum 18. 1 September 2005. Magda Hornemann. "China: Is Central or Local Government Responsible for Religious Freedom Violations?" <http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=641&pdf=Y> [Accessed 6 Mar. 2007]

Human Rights Watch (HRW). 1 March 2006. "China - A Year after New Regulations, Religious Rights Still Restricted: Arrests, Closures, Crackdowns Continue." <http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/03/01/china12740.htm> [Accessed 5 Mar. 2007]

The Standard [Hong Kong]. 3 October 2006. Justin Mitchell. "Spiritual Upheaval in Offing." (Factiva)

_____. N.d. "Contact Us." <http://www.thestandard.com.hk/contactus.asp> [Accessed 4 May 2007]

United States (US). 6 March 2007. Department of State. "China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)." Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2006. <http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78771.htm> [Accessed 7 Mar. 2007]

_____. 15 September 2006. Department of State. "China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)." International Religious Freedom Report 2006. <http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71338.htm> [Accessed 7 Mar. 2007]

The Washington Post. 1 October 2006. Maureen Fan. "In China, Churches Challenge the Rules; Bold Congregations Risk Official Wrath." (Factiva)

Additional Sources Consulted

Internet sites, including: Amnesty International (AI), British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), China Internet Information Center, Dui Hua Foundation, European Country of Origin Information Network (ecoi.net), Factiva, The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, Freedom House, The Guardian, Human Rights in China (HRIC), Laogai Research Foundation, United Kingdom Home Office, World Evangelical Alliance (WEA).

​​
​​

​​​